This research is entitled "Language and Ideology of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates on Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates Debate Show: Critical Discourse Analysis". The method used in the research is a qualitative method with Critical Discourse Analysis approach. The main theory used is the three-dimensional framework by Norman Fairclough. The research aims at (1) analyzing and formulating textual dimensions used by the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates on the Presidential and Vice-Presdential Debate Show in 2014; (2) analyzing and formulating discourse dimensions (discourse practice) conveyed in the event of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates Debate in 2014; (3) analyzing and formulating soci-cultural dimensions (socio-cultural practice) and events underlying the Debate of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates in 2014; (4) analyzing and formulating ideologies of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates conveyed through events and the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates Debate in 2014. The theories used in the research are Norman Fairclough (1992b, 1995a; 1998; 2000), Teun van Dijk (1992, 1995), Titscher (2009), Jorgensen (2007), and Richardson (2007). The results show that the two Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates have conveyed different ideologies during the Presidential and VicePresidential Debate on television. The Presidential Candidate number one conveys the ideologies of military, firmness, discipline etc. Meanwhile the Presidential Candidate number two conveys the ideologies of modesty, togetherness, and perseverance. The ideologies of the two Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates affect the voters in voting their Presidential and Vice-Presidential choices.