Primarily India is a strong believer in panchasheela principles. The most pr-eminent principle is non-aggression, and India is one of the glaring examples which, after it's metamorphoisation into a nation state based on democratic principles after it's glories independence, perused non-aggression policy. It is this panchsheela principle helped India turn into an impeccable non-aligned countries leadership. The Indian state as non aliened and non-aggression country continued to exist unstained till 1962 when beguiled china waged a war against India and hence rethinking and restructuring India's foreign policy took. One must revere India's far-sightedness and sagacity, when there where efforts to convince India to sign NPT and CTBT international facts. India did not sign and by not signing such facts India prudently retained its right of free existence, otherwise it could have been constrained and constricted by itself, thank god, and no inadertelcnce could confound this country. India's not signing this fact was a judicious decision, but the relevance of global endorsement of CTBT and NPT has not yet lost the sight of. It is at this juncture and taking note of the belligerent attitudes of from within the nighourwood and across the global strategic actors, what could be the plausible stand India could undertake in the 21st century, is all what this paper throws it light on and also on the cadence of foreign policy in the perceptive of the 21st century.