Enhancing Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) through Transformational Leadership, Interpersonal Communication, and Work Motivation
Syamsudin1*, Billy Tunas1, Rita Retnowati1
Citation : Syamsudin, Billy Tunas, Rita Retnowati, Enhancing Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) through Transformational Leadership, Interpersonal Communication, and Work Motivation International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research 2019 , 7(4) : 54-61.
The purpose of this study to determine the problems of poor Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) of Teachers. The independent variables in this study are Transformational leadership, Interpersonal Communication, and Work Motivation. The selected sample amounted to 216 teachers on Islamic Junior High School in East Jakarta. This study used Mixed Method with Sequential Explanatory, started with a quantitative method then followed with a qualitative method to get a more profound result and more comprehensive result. Further, Scientific Identification Theory of Operation Research in Education Management (SITOREM) is used to rank the hierarchy of improvement.
The results of this research indicate a significant positive relationship between: (1) Transformational Leadership with Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), with correlation coefficient ry1 = 0.518 and coefficient of determination r2y1 = 0.268 (2) Interpersonal Communication with Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) with coefficient correlation ry2 = 0.639 and coefficient determination r2y2 = 0.408 (3) Work Motivation with Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) with coefficient correlation ry3 = 0,356 and coefficient of determination r2y3 = 0.126 (4) Transformational Leadership, Interpersonal Communication and Work Motivation together with Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), regression equation = 32.07 + 0.153 X1 + 0.425 X2 + 0.182 X3 with correlation coefficient ry123 = 0.704, and the coefficient of determination r2y123 = 0.496 indicating that the percentage of contribution of independent variables collectively to the dependent variable is equal to 49.6%, while the rest of 50.4% is influenced by other variables not included in this research model. The results of this quantitative study are also reinforced by qualitative research.